I saw the headline “Is nature out of control?” earlier today and read the story which now bears the headline, Big quake question: Are they getting worse?
I thought the following was seriously stupid, considering the age of the earth:
One scientist, however, says that relative to the time period from the mid-1970s to the mid-1990s, Earth has been more active over the past 15 years or so.
Even if that “one scientist” is a YEC, that’s some extrapolation extraordinaire.
Even though I’m not a geologist, my BS detector pegged on that one. At least one geologist, Erik Klemetti, apparently agrees — calling this type of headline “irresponsible, reprehensible “journalism” that the worst hacks should be ashamed to print.”
And I certainly agree with Mr. Klemetti’s final point:
The point here is that the Earth is an active place – and we have very short experience with seeing events on a global scale. Reckless speculation the likes of which MSNBC (and LiveScience) partook in should be a warning of how the media still has a long way to come when it comes to reporting the facts rather than the hysteria of the natural world.