<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Complexity For Complexity&#8217;s Sake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opiningonline.com/2009/08/16/complexity-for-complexitys-sake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opiningonline.com/2009/08/16/complexity-for-complexitys-sake/</link>
	<description>Opinions, about almost anything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:22:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna B.</title>
		<link>http://opiningonline.com/2009/08/16/complexity-for-complexitys-sake/comment-page-1/#comment-6108</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opiningonline.com/2009/08/16/complexity-for-complexitys-sake/#comment-6108</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not watching anything by Moore, just like I&#039;m not listening to Rush!! But I did read Julie Pierce&#039;s testimony to the House. I certainly wouldn&#039;t defend the actions of the insurance company. But the glaring unasked question is where was the guy&#039;s union? 

Anyway, there&#039;s no evidence the insurance companies are behind the &quot;anger&quot; at health care reform. The protests started before the push as a response to the TARP spending and the suggestion of second stimulus bill. 

I suspect the insurance companies are just like the drug companies in that they are working closely with whoever is writing this bill to make sure they get their &quot;fair&quot; share of the spoils. I imagine their selling point is something along the lines of &quot;look, we know how to screw people over to save money... let us help you.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not watching anything by Moore, just like I&#8217;m not listening to Rush!! But I did read Julie Pierce&#8217;s testimony to the House. I certainly wouldn&#8217;t defend the actions of the insurance company. But the glaring unasked question is where was the guy&#8217;s union? </p>
<p>Anyway, there&#8217;s no evidence the insurance companies are behind the &#8220;anger&#8221; at health care reform. The protests started before the push as a response to the TARP spending and the suggestion of second stimulus bill. </p>
<p>I suspect the insurance companies are just like the drug companies in that they are working closely with whoever is writing this bill to make sure they get their &#8220;fair&#8221; share of the spoils. I imagine their selling point is something along the lines of &#8220;look, we know how to screw people over to save money&#8230; let us help you.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittleSister</title>
		<link>http://opiningonline.com/2009/08/16/complexity-for-complexitys-sake/comment-page-1/#comment-6102</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleSister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opiningonline.com/2009/08/16/complexity-for-complexitys-sake/#comment-6102</guid>
		<description>No wonder the insurance companies are behind so much of the anger at health care reform.

Right *they* are getting to make the decisions in his &quot;logic&quot; points 1 through 5 work -- and all for exactly the same reasons.

To see how well that&#039;s working out, watch &quot;Sicko.&quot; Doesn&#039;t matter what your opinion of Michael Moore is. Just watch it. Or at least watch the segment about Julie Pierce&#039;s husband. Or, rather, I should say her late husband.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No wonder the insurance companies are behind so much of the anger at health care reform.</p>
<p>Right *they* are getting to make the decisions in his &#8220;logic&#8221; points 1 through 5 work &#8212; and all for exactly the same reasons.</p>
<p>To see how well that&#8217;s working out, watch &#8220;Sicko.&#8221; Doesn&#8217;t matter what your opinion of Michael Moore is. Just watch it. Or at least watch the segment about Julie Pierce&#8217;s husband. Or, rather, I should say her late husband.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

