<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Constitutional Originalism And&#8230; Whatever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opiningonline.com/2009/03/15/constitutional-originalism-and-whatever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opiningonline.com/2009/03/15/constitutional-originalism-and-whatever/</link>
	<description>Opinions, about almost anything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 02:53:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Rostrom</title>
		<link>http://opiningonline.com/2009/03/15/constitutional-originalism-and-whatever/comment-page-1/#comment-1849</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Rostrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opiningonline.com/2009/03/15/constitutional-originalism-and-whatever/#comment-1849</guid>
		<description>Natural rights are what you have if no one meddles with you: life, liberty, property. The right to possess weapons for self-defense falls into that category. There can be no &quot;natural right&quot; to housing, education, or health care, which in general must be provided by someone else. One can define a right to the liberty to acquire these goods, that is, not to be arbitrarily barred from acquiring them, but that is not what welfare-state advocates mean by &quot;right to &quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Natural rights are what you have if no one meddles with you: life, liberty, property. The right to possess weapons for self-defense falls into that category. There can be no &#8220;natural right&#8221; to housing, education, or health care, which in general must be provided by someone else. One can define a right to the liberty to acquire these goods, that is, not to be arbitrarily barred from acquiring them, but that is not what welfare-state advocates mean by &#8220;right to &#8220;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna B.</title>
		<link>http://opiningonline.com/2009/03/15/constitutional-originalism-and-whatever/comment-page-1/#comment-1834</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opiningonline.com/2009/03/15/constitutional-originalism-and-whatever/#comment-1834</guid>
		<description>Should I infer from CPP&#039;s comment that he&#039;s not with me on the other items? Probably :-)

You&#039;re Welcome, Dr. Isis!

Michelle, enjoy your Sunday afternoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should I infer from CPP&#8217;s comment that he&#8217;s not with me on the other items? Probably <img src='http://opiningonline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You&#8217;re Welcome, Dr. Isis!</p>
<p>Michelle, enjoy your Sunday afternoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Bell</title>
		<link>http://opiningonline.com/2009/03/15/constitutional-originalism-and-whatever/comment-page-1/#comment-1833</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opiningonline.com/2009/03/15/constitutional-originalism-and-whatever/#comment-1833</guid>
		<description>I, too, have been thoroughly enjoying Dr. Isis&#039;s blog.  And damn, she&#039;s got herself some hot hot shoes.

This was quite interesting.  Especially the thoughts about the government&#039;s involvement within business and what&#039;s required.  Quite a bit to think about.  Luckily, I have a sun beam on a lazy Sunday afternoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, have been thoroughly enjoying Dr. Isis&#8217;s blog.  And damn, she&#8217;s got herself some hot hot shoes.</p>
<p>This was quite interesting.  Especially the thoughts about the government&#8217;s involvement within business and what&#8217;s required.  Quite a bit to think about.  Luckily, I have a sun beam on a lazy Sunday afternoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isis the Scientist</title>
		<link>http://opiningonline.com/2009/03/15/constitutional-originalism-and-whatever/comment-page-1/#comment-1832</link>
		<dc:creator>Isis the Scientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opiningonline.com/2009/03/15/constitutional-originalism-and-whatever/#comment-1832</guid>
		<description>Awwww!  Thanks Donna!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awwww!  Thanks Donna!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Food Calories List 10 Terrible Eating Related Disorders - The List Universe &#171;</title>
		<link>http://opiningonline.com/2009/03/15/constitutional-originalism-and-whatever/comment-page-1/#comment-1828</link>
		<dc:creator>Food Calories List 10 Terrible Eating Related Disorders - The List Universe &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opiningonline.com/2009/03/15/constitutional-originalism-and-whatever/#comment-1828</guid>
		<description>[...]  Opining Online ? Constitutional Originalism And? Whatever  By Donna B.  Left out of Comrade PhysioProf?s list is whether there is a right to education. Most states (not necessarily the federal government) mandate education for their citizens to a great degree. Parents are punished for not sending &#8230; Food. Calories, to be exact. Should the federal government concern itself with providing a given number of calories to every citizen? Should the federal government concern itself with providing a certain quality of calories to every citizen? &#8230;   Opining Online - http://opiningonline.com/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Opining Online ? Constitutional Originalism And? Whatever  By Donna B.  Left out of Comrade PhysioProf?s list is whether there is a right to education. Most states (not necessarily the federal government) mandate education for their citizens to a great degree. Parents are punished for not sending &#8230; Food. Calories, to be exact. Should the federal government concern itself with providing a given number of calories to every citizen? Should the federal government concern itself with providing a certain quality of calories to every citizen? &#8230;   Opining Online &#8211; <a href="http://opiningonline.com/" rel="nofollow">http://opiningonline.com/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comrade PhysioProf</title>
		<link>http://opiningonline.com/2009/03/15/constitutional-originalism-and-whatever/comment-page-1/#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>Comrade PhysioProf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opiningonline.com/2009/03/15/constitutional-originalism-and-whatever/#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>I am with you on the government staying out of the religious appurtenances of marriage:

http://physioprof.wordpress.com/2008/11/09/marriage-equality/
http://physioprof.wordpress.com/2008/06/17/gay-marriage-boon-or-scourge/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with you on the government staying out of the religious appurtenances of marriage:</p>
<p><a href="http://physioprof.wordpress.com/2008/11/09/marriage-equality/" rel="nofollow">http://physioprof.wordpress.com/2008/11/09/marriage-equality/</a><br />
<a href="http://physioprof.wordpress.com/2008/06/17/gay-marriage-boon-or-scourge/" rel="nofollow">http://physioprof.wordpress.com/2008/06/17/gay-marriage-boon-or-scourge/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

