<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Underhanded, Dishonest Attempt To Drive Gun Manufacturers Out Of Business, Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opiningonline.com/2008/06/30/underhanded-dishonest-attempt-to-drive-gun-manufacturers-out-of-business-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opiningonline.com/2008/06/30/underhanded-dishonest-attempt-to-drive-gun-manufacturers-out-of-business-part-2/</link>
	<description>Opinions, about almost anything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 02:53:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna B.</title>
		<link>http://opiningonline.com/2008/06/30/underhanded-dishonest-attempt-to-drive-gun-manufacturers-out-of-business-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opiningonline.com/2008/06/30/underhanded-dishonest-attempt-to-drive-gun-manufacturers-out-of-business-part-2/#comment-190</guid>
		<description>oh my... I fear, dear bro, that you need more than a spellcheck. Or perhaps a different kind of spellcheck than the one you mention.

Actually if my neighbor is law-abiding, I&#039;m somewhat less likely to need my own gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh my&#8230; I fear, dear bro, that you need more than a spellcheck. Or perhaps a different kind of spellcheck than the one you mention.</p>
<p>Actually if my neighbor is law-abiding, I&#8217;m somewhat less likely to need my own gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RDB</title>
		<link>http://opiningonline.com/2008/06/30/underhanded-dishonest-attempt-to-drive-gun-manufacturers-out-of-business-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>RDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opiningonline.com/2008/06/30/underhanded-dishonest-attempt-to-drive-gun-manufacturers-out-of-business-part-2/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>I want to leave an addendum. The Left, in this country at least, don&#039;t know how to use guns very well - hence
the Weather peoole, and have elected non-violence (spellcheck?).

I think we are a group of citizens tired of being lied to, frightened into conformity, misled by our innate
patriotism.  The worst mistake that Cheney, et al. has ever made was to accuse us of being traitors.  That will
not abide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to leave an addendum. The Left, in this country at least, don&#8217;t know how to use guns very well &#8211; hence<br />
the Weather peoole, and have elected non-violence (spellcheck?).</p>
<p>I think we are a group of citizens tired of being lied to, frightened into conformity, misled by our innate<br />
patriotism.  The worst mistake that Cheney, et al. has ever made was to accuse us of being traitors.  That will<br />
not abide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RDB</title>
		<link>http://opiningonline.com/2008/06/30/underhanded-dishonest-attempt-to-drive-gun-manufacturers-out-of-business-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>RDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opiningonline.com/2008/06/30/underhanded-dishonest-attempt-to-drive-gun-manufacturers-out-of-business-part-2/#comment-188</guid>
		<description>I do not have time to read all this crap.  It is trully silly to sue gun manufacturors and cities and the company
in Maryland that makes it all possible.  I don&#039;t know what is right.  In the old Westerns, including Hickok and
Bat and John and Wyatt, the sherrif always required the gunmen to check their weopans (How come you don&#039;t
have spellcheck here?  And your margin control is tedious.)

Actually the Sherrif would be the County and the Marshall would be the town, who would probably be Dean Martin
instead of Andy.  

I, the penultimate liberal, do not want to ban guns, especially since it cannot, and could not, ever have been done
since those illiterate and backward Chinese invented gunpowder.  The 4th is even now about us - Can I come see
the fireworks over the river with some shrimp?

This is my, yours, everyone&#039;s question.  For thousands of years, the Attillas, the Monarchs, the persons in
absolute power always killed all their potential enemies in advance, and let God sort them our.  The Magna Carta
got it started about the fiction of divine stuff about Kings.  Everybody knew that divinity came from swords.

Then a little upstart colony, perhaps abetted by others, declared that the King is not boss.  And that is where we
are on the second amendment.  You and I can carry a gun - but we would not need to unless the neighbor also had
one.  This is the definition of chaos and anarchrists.  (Where is that spellcheck?)

It was probably the hope of the Founders that we would eventually progress beyond that.  Hasn&#039;t happened.  Your
jubilation is misdirected.  In a Government of the Right, only the Left is secured by the ruling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not have time to read all this crap.  It is trully silly to sue gun manufacturors and cities and the company<br />
in Maryland that makes it all possible.  I don&#8217;t know what is right.  In the old Westerns, including Hickok and<br />
Bat and John and Wyatt, the sherrif always required the gunmen to check their weopans (How come you don&#8217;t<br />
have spellcheck here?  And your margin control is tedious.)</p>
<p>Actually the Sherrif would be the County and the Marshall would be the town, who would probably be Dean Martin<br />
instead of Andy.  </p>
<p>I, the penultimate liberal, do not want to ban guns, especially since it cannot, and could not, ever have been done<br />
since those illiterate and backward Chinese invented gunpowder.  The 4th is even now about us &#8211; Can I come see<br />
the fireworks over the river with some shrimp?</p>
<p>This is my, yours, everyone&#8217;s question.  For thousands of years, the Attillas, the Monarchs, the persons in<br />
absolute power always killed all their potential enemies in advance, and let God sort them our.  The Magna Carta<br />
got it started about the fiction of divine stuff about Kings.  Everybody knew that divinity came from swords.</p>
<p>Then a little upstart colony, perhaps abetted by others, declared that the King is not boss.  And that is where we<br />
are on the second amendment.  You and I can carry a gun &#8211; but we would not need to unless the neighbor also had<br />
one.  This is the definition of chaos and anarchrists.  (Where is that spellcheck?)</p>
<p>It was probably the hope of the Founders that we would eventually progress beyond that.  Hasn&#8217;t happened.  Your<br />
jubilation is misdirected.  In a Government of the Right, only the Left is secured by the ruling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

