http://opiningonline.com/2008/06/29/underhanded-dishonest-attempt-to-drive-gun-manufacturers-out-of-business-part-1/ Opinions, about almost anything Sat, 12 May 2012 02:53:48 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://opiningonline.com/2008/06/29/underhanded-dishonest-attempt-to-drive-gun-manufacturers-out-of-business-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2455 How to Get Six Pack Fast Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:45:19 +0000 http://opiningonline.com/2008/06/29/underhanded-dishonest-attempt-to-drive-gun-manufacturers-out-of-business-part-1/#comment-2455 My fellow on Facebook shared this link with me and I'm not dissapointed that I came to your blog. My fellow on Facebook shared this link with me and I’m not dissapointed that I came to your blog.

]]> http://opiningonline.com/2008/06/29/underhanded-dishonest-attempt-to-drive-gun-manufacturers-out-of-business-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-187 Opining Online » Underhanded, Dishonest Attempt To Drive Gun Manufacturers Out Of Business, Part 2 Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:01:58 +0000 http://opiningonline.com/2008/06/29/underhanded-dishonest-attempt-to-drive-gun-manufacturers-out-of-business-part-1/#comment-187 [...] Continued from Part 1. (I couldn’t sleep, so why wait for tomorrow?) Under our plan, Congress might require gun makers in the aggregate to reduce gun homicides from 12,000 to, say, 7,000 in 10 years, with appropriate interim targets along the way. Individual firms would each have their own targets to meet, based on the extent their guns are currently used in homicides. Or Congress might simply leave it to neutral experts to determine just how much of a numerical reduction should be required — and how quickly. Either way, the required decline would be substantial. [...] [...] Continued from Part 1. (I couldn’t sleep, so why wait for tomorrow?) Under our plan, Congress might require gun makers in the aggregate to reduce gun homicides from 12,000 to, say, 7,000 in 10 years, with appropriate interim targets along the way. Individual firms would each have their own targets to meet, based on the extent their guns are currently used in homicides. Or Congress might simply leave it to neutral experts to determine just how much of a numerical reduction should be required — and how quickly. Either way, the required decline would be substantial. [...]

]]>